Boston Globe — In the Ocean State, a legal dispute centers on voting rights and beach cabanas

An image from the Bonnet Shores Fire District websiteSCREEN GRAB

An image from the Bonnet Shores Fire District websiteSCREEN GRAB

June 14, 2021

By Edward Fitzpatrick — PROVIDENCE — The ACLU blasts Bonnet Shores Fire District for limiting voting rights to those who own more than $400 worth of property

In the rich annals of Rhode Island legal battles, this case lacks the high-society intrigue of the Claus von Bülow murder trial or the envelope-full-of-cash evidence unveiled during the “Operation Plunder Dome” investigation of Providence City Hall.

But it’s tough to find more quintessentially Rhode Island litigation than a current lawsuit involving Bonnet Shores and its cabanas, which for generations have symbolized summer living at the beach in Narragansett.

A group of residents is suing the Bonnet Shores Fire District, claiming it’s unconstitutional for the district to prevent residents from voting if they own less than $400 worth of property. The say that restriction prevents some year-round residents from voting while giving voting rights to non-residents who own beach cabanas – including 16-square-foot “bathroom units.”

Previous
Previous

The Public’s Radio — R.I. House to study public access to the coastline

Next
Next

Uprise RI — You must own property to vote in this Rhode Island fire district’s elections